Third Annual MSU MPEG-4 AVC/H.264 Video Codec Comparison

For people, who make real research in field of high-end video compression and professionally use videocodecs

See NEW VERSION on Fourth Annual H.264/AVC comparison page!

Codecs that Were Tested

Comparison Content

There are two parts of the comparison - 2006 year results and over-years comparison. First part is comparison of modern codecs, provided by developers in this year. Second part is summarizing of H.264 codecs results over three previous years.

Following metrics were measured:

Codecs were analyzed separately in the following types of application:

Individual codecs’ settings were used for each of that types of application.

Video sequences that were used in this comparison:

Different Comparion Versions

Short version of report is now available at website for free download (52 pages, 47 figures). Full version of report now available for free download too (157 pages, 185 charts). It includes following additional topics:

You can download full version of report (PDF, 1.6 Mb) or support us purchasing full version using this link.

Comparison Rules

All codec’s options and presets were provided by codec’s authors

An important restriction on a preset is encoding time for it. A few iterations of compliance testing and preset optimization were made to meet the requirements.

JM 9.8 reference decoder was used to decode all encoded streams.

All objective metrics measurements were performed with MSU Video Quality Measurement Tool (Pro Version)

For each preset both speed and quality were measured

Download

Third Annual MSU H.264 Video Codec Comparison - PDF (1.38 Mb)

Third Annual MSU H.264 Video Codec Comparison - ZIP (1.2 Mb)

Third Annual MSU H.264 Video Codec Comparison Full Version - PDF (1.6 Mb) (Free now!)

Dear video codec professionals!
You can support this comparison by buying the full version of our report.

This contribution will help us:

Thank you for your contribution in advance!

The full report will be available immediately following this link.

If you have a discount code please use this form (if you are a member of scientific/academic organization, please contact us).

Thanks

Special thanks to the following big and small contributors

Intel AMD Adobe KDDI R&D labs Tata Elxsi

Contacts

E-mail: videocodec-testing@graphics.cs.msu.ru

10 Mar 2011
See Also
Automatic local color correction in S3D video
Stereo video may contain a huge color discrepancy. Most of the problems are hard to eliminate because of possible different distortions in each area in the frame.
Call for HEVC codecs 2019
Fourteen modern video codec comparison
HEVC Video Codecs Comparison 2018 (Thirteen MSU Video Codec Comparison)
13th MSU video codecs comparison
HEVC Video Codecs Comparison 2017 (Twelfth MSU Video Codec Comparison)
12th MSU video codecs comparison
MSU Video Codec Comparisons (6 test of lossless, MPEG-4 and MPEG-4 AVC)
Call for HEVC codecs 2018
Site structure